Gherkin: Key to Behavior-Driven Development

Mykhailo – CEO Testomat.io test management tool. Professional manager with over 18 years of experience in the IT industry. Besides he is a dedicated leader, purposeful entrepreneur and investor for the Growth Hacker IT, Startups, HoReCa, Development, Accounting. Keep up with the news out of Mykhailo through his personal resources below ↩️

11 min read
956 views

In software development, clear communication and teamwork matter a lot. Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) can help with this by making sure everyone knows the requirements. However, there are some downsides to using this approach.

What is Gherkin?

Gherkin is a simple, human-readable language used in Behavior-Driven Development (BDD). It helps teams write clear scenarios that describe how software should behave, making collaboration easier and keeping documentation accurate.
As one of the BDD frameworks, it is an easy text language for Cucumber, CodeceptJS and Codeception. It helps business people and technical teams to create test scenarios clearly and easily. The Gherkin language is composed in such a way that anyone can understand the written tests, even those with a limited scope of programming knowledge.
Based on the method of Behavior-Driven Development (BDD), Gherkin helps describe how software should behave. This helps both technical and non-technical people work together and stay on the same page.

Why Grerkin Matters in Behavior-Driven Development (BDD)

Gherkin plays a vital role in Behavior-Driven Development by transforming complex requirements into simple, structured documentation. Its clear, human-readable syntax makes it accessible to everyone involved in the development process — not just engineers, but also product owners, business analysts, and QA specialists.

Rather than relying on lengthy technical manuals or ambiguous user stories, Gherkin provides a formalized way to describe system behavior through conversational language. This simplicity allows teams to align on expectations early, often during Three Amigos sessions, where developers, testers, and business stakeholders collaborate to define what “done” looks like.

By acting as a living specification, Gherkin helps teams reduce misunderstandings, improve test coverage, and keep requirements tightly coupled with automated validation. It bridges the gap between business intent and technical implementation, making BDD not just possible, but practical.

Gherkin in Agile & BDD Workflows

Gherkin focuses on teamwork, taking small steps, and getting regular feedback. This method fits well with Agile practices.

In Agile teams, Gherkin helps connect business and tech teams. It helps everyone understand user stories and acceptance criteria together. This way, Agile teams can deliver value bit by bit and adjust to new needs quickly. Gherkin serves well in Agile and BDD workflows:

  • User stories → drive features
  • Scenarios in Gherkin → describe behavior of these features
  • Automation tools like Cucumber, SpecFlow, or Behave → link Gherkin to real tests

This creates a shared understanding between Product, Dev, and QA. For example, Gherkin could be implemented like this in the Agile Dev Cycle:

Phase Gherkin Role
Backlog Grooming Write Gherkin with product + QA + devs for shared understanding
Sprint Planning Use scenarios as acceptance criteria
Dev & QA Automate tests from Gherkin using tools like Cucumber
Sprint Review Validate stories by walking through Gherkin scenarios

Basic Structure of a Gherkin Scenarios

A Gherkin .feature file is structured to describe software behavior using scenarios. It begins with a Feature keyword, followed by a description of the feature. Each scenario within the feature outlines specific examples of how the feature should behave, using keywords like Given, When, and Then to define the context, actions, and expected outcomes. Here’s a breakdown of the structure:

1. Feature:

  • The first keyword in a feature file is Feature, which provides a high-level description of the functionality being tested.
  • It acts as a container for related scenarios.
  • The description can include a title and optional free-form text for further explanation.

2. Scenario:

  • Scenarios are specific examples of how the feature should behave.
  • Each scenario outlines a path through the feature, focusing on a particular aspect.
  • They are defined using the Scenario keyword, followed by a descriptive title.

3. Steps (Given, When, Then, And, But):

  • Scenarios consist of a series of steps that describe the actions and expected outcomes.
  • Given: Sets up the initial context or preconditions for the scenario.
  • When: Describes the action or event that triggers the scenario.
  • Then: States the expected outcome of the scenario.
  • And and But: Used to add additional steps or conditions, extending the Given, When, or Then statements.

4. Tags:

  • Tags can be used to group features and scenarios together, making it easier to organize and run tests.

For example, the User Login feature describes how users access the system through the login page. If they enter the correct username and password, they’re taken to the home page. If the login details are incorrect, the system shows an error message to let them know something went wrong.


Feature: User Login
As a user, I want to be able to log in to the system.

  Scenario: Successful Login
    Given the user is on the login page
    When the user enters valid credentials
    Then the user should be redirected to the home page

Features and Scenarios Explained

At the center of Gherkin are “Features” and “Scenarios.” A Gherkin Feature points out a specific ability of the software. It comes with related test cases and explains how a feature should work in different situations.

  • Scenarios serve as test cases.
  • Each feature has different scenarios.
  • These scenarios imitate how real users behave.
  • They explain certain actions and the results you should expect.
  • They offer a simple guide on how a system should react to various inputs or situations.

To avoid repeating tests for similar tasks with different data, Gherkin uses “Scenario Outlines.” These are like templates. They allow testers to run the same scenario many times with different data. This way, testers can check everything well while keeping the code simple and effective.

Step Definitions: Given, When, Then

Gherkin syntax uses a simple format called Given-When-Then. This format helps to describe the steps for each test case. It makes it easy to understand the setup, the actions taken, and the expected results in a scenario.

  • “Given” shows where the system starts. It describes what the system looks like before anything happens. This step makes sure the system is prepared for what follows.
  • “When” tells us about the action that makes the system respond. It includes what the user does or what takes place in the system that changes how it works.
  • “Then” shows what should happen after the action in the “When” step. It explains how the system should behave after that action, so we can check if it works as intended.

What is an Effective Gherkin Test?

Creating good Gherkin tests isn’t just about understanding the syntax. You also need to follow best practices. These practices make the tests clear, simple to update, and dependable.

It is important to write tests that are short and clear. These tests should show how real users interact with the system. Use simple words and avoid technical terms. Focus on one part of the system for each test. This way, your Gherkin tests will be better and easier to handle.

Advantages of Using Gherkin

Gherkin is a powerful communication tool that brings developers, testers, and business stakeholders onto the same page. By describing behavior in plain language, Gherkin helps teams define, automate, and validate application functionality with less friction and more clarity. Below are the key advantages of using Gherkin in modern Agile and BDD workflows.

Better Communication Across the Team

Since Gherkin uses plain English, everyone, whether they are technical or not, can understand what the software is supposed to do. This helps developers, testers, and business stakeholders stay on the same page and reduces the chances of misunderstandings. It also keeps the focus on the user experience, which leads to more useful related features.

Documentation That Stays Current

Gherkin scenarios are tied directly to automated tests, which means they reflect the software’s real behavior, not just how it was supposed to work. You are not stuck with outdated documents, and your team always has a reliable reference point. These scenarios are version-controlled and stored with the code, so everyone can access and update them easily.

Faster Development and Better Testing

Because Gherkin scenarios can be turned into automated tests, they help speed up testing and give quick feedback during development. Writing tests before building features also helps catch issues early. Since Gherkin fits well with Agile practices, it supports frequent changes and constant improvement.

Long-Term Efficiency and Better Test Coverage

Gherkin scenarios are easy to update as requirements change, which helps lower the time and cost of maintaining tests. They also encourage teams to think through different use cases and edge cases, improving overall test coverage. The structured format allows you to reuse steps across different tests, reducing repetition and making your test suite easier to manage.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid in BDD Test Case Writing and How To Solve Them

Gherkin makes it easier for you to write tests. However, there are a few common mistakes to remember. These mistakes can make your test cases less effective.

Common Pitfall Problem How to Solve
Overly detailed test cases Test cases focus too much on implementation details rather than user behavior Keep test cases simple and focused on user actions and expected outcomes
Ambiguous or unclear language Steps are confusing or open to multiple interpretations Use clear, simple, and precise language with one meaning per step
Missing the “Given” step Test context or initial conditions are not properly set up, leading to unreliable tests Always include a “Given” step to establish the correct initial state before test execution

By avoiding these mistakes and using these Gherkin strategies, you can build better and more reliable Gherkin tests. This will improve your testing as well as the quality of the software.

How Is Gherkin Linked to Automated Test Code

The main connection of the language with automated test code is through its syntax. It uses a plain text format, operating such keywords as Given, When, and Then, which are linked to corresponding automated code that executes all the required steps. Thanks to it, the language stays abstract and readable, which allows non-technical users to understand the scenarios and technical users to maintain the test code.

Gherkin is paired with testing frameworks that interpret and run them — the most well-known being Cucumber, which connects human-readable tests to real system behavior.

Together, Gherkin and these frameworks simplify test automation, improve collaboration, and create living documentation that evolves with your product. Below is a comparison of popular frameworks that support Gherkin syntax:

Framework Language(s) Description
Cucumber Java, JavaScript, Ruby, etc. The most widely used BDD tool; executes Gherkin scenarios directly.
SpecFlow .NET (C#) Native BDD framework for .NET; integrates tightly with Visual Studio.
Behave Python Lightweight BDD framework for Python projects; uses Gherkin syntax.
Gauge Multiple (Java, C#, JS) Developed by ThoughtWorks; supports markdown-style Gherkin + plugins.
CodeceptJS JavaScript End-to-end test framework with Gherkin plugin; integrates with WebDriver.
Cucumber-Jest JavaScript/TypeScript Combines Jest’s test runner with Cucumber support for BDD testing.

Requirements to Test Management System: What Do True Testers Need?

Every test automation with the language has its own set of requirements in order for the analysis to succeed. Everything starts with defining the Agile roles in BDD. Every project must include a team that consists of:

  • QAs;
  • Dev team;
  • BA (business analysts);
  • PM (project managers) or PO (product owners).

Then, there are technical requirements that must be met by the system for integrating Gherkin naturally. The basic criteria include:

  • Gherkin-Friendly Editor. The system should let users write, edit, and manage Gherkin feature files with syntax highlighting and support for key elements like Given, When, Then, tags, backgrounds, and scenario outlines.
  • Seamless BDD Tool Integration. It should work smoothly with popular BDD tools such as Cucumber, SpecFlow, or Behave, making it easy to plug into existing testing workflows.
  • Automation & CI/CD Support. The platform should connect with CI/CD tools (like Jenkins or GitLab), allow automated test execution, and display test results directly in the system.
  • Test Management & Result Tracking. The system should let you track which scenarios are passing, which ones failed, and how they map to defects or bugs, offering a full picture of test coverage.
  • Team Collaboration Tools. It should support multiple users working on the same features, with options for comments, approvals, and version history to review what changed and why.
  • Reporting & Dashboards. The platform should offer easy-to-read dashboards that show test progress, coverage, and trends, with filters for tags, features, or test status.
  • Gherkin also helps with living documentation. This means that the tests will update when the software updates. This is important for development that happens in steps. Because of this, Gherkin is a great tool for teams that want to be flexible and create high-quality software frequently.

Once these requirements are met, the team can proceed with setting up the testing environment and running the very first check using Gherkin.

How Do Gherkin Scenarios Work with Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Delivery (CD)?

Gherkin scenarios integrate smoothly with Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Delivery (CD) pipelines, helping Agile teams deliver high-quality software faster. When used with CI/CD, Gherkin scenarios automatically run each time code is pushed, ensuring that new changes do not disrupt existing functionality. This provides early detection of issues, minimizes risks, and ensures that only stable, verified features are deployed. Here’s how Gherkin enhances CI/CD practices:

  • Automated Test Execution: With Gherkin scenarios written in a BDD framework like Cucumber, tests can be automatically executed as part of the CI pipeline. When developers push changes, the pipeline runs these scenarios, validating that new code aligns with predefined acceptance criteria and doesn’t introduce regressions.
  • Immediate Feedback Loop: CI/CD practices emphasize frequent integration and testing to provide immediate feedback. Gherkin’s clear, business-oriented scenarios allow both technical and non-technical team members to understand results, facilitating prompt discussions and decisions.
  • Living Documentation in Real Time: Gherkin scenarios act as living documentation within a CI/CD environment. As the software evolves and scenarios pass or fail, the documentation reflects the latest behavior of the system. This keeps the whole team aligned on current functionality and prevents outdated documentation from leading to misunderstandings.
  • Continuous Quality Assurance: By integrating Gherkin-based tests into the CI/CD pipeline, teams can enforce continuous quality checks. Each build goes through comprehensive Gherkin-based testing, ensuring that any issues are detected early and resolved before deployment.

Conclusion

Gherkin is very important as it helps teams work together better and be more efficient. Gherkin has a simple structure and is closely connected with Cucumber. This connection allows teams to speed up their testing and improve BDD, which means behavior-driven development.

Writing clear Gherkin tests and using good practices is key to avoiding common mistakes. This helps make software projects successful. There are many examples in the real world that show how helpful Gherkin can be. It is flexible and is valuable in several industries. You should use Gherkin to make your testing better. Keep learning and creating!

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a Gherkin scenario and a traditional test case? Testomat

A Gherkin scenario is written in plain language and follows a structured Given-When-Then format, making it readable for both technical and non-technical team members, whereas traditional test cases often use more technical, step-by-step instructions.

What is the difference between Gherkin and Cucumber? Testomat

Gherkin is a language used to write test scenarios, while Cucumber is a tool that executes these scenarios by translating Gherkin steps into code for testing.

Is Gherkin limited to any specific programming language? Testomat

No, Gherkin is language-agnostic and can be used with multiple programming languages through compatible testing frameworks.

Can I use Gherkin for both manual and automated testing? Testomat

Yes, Gherkin can be used to design test cases for manual testing or automated testing when integrated with tools like Cucumber.

Can I reuse Gherkin steps across different scenarios? Testomat

Yes, Gherkin steps are modular and reusable, allowing you to apply the same steps across multiple scenarios to maintain consistency.

How do I maintain Gherkin scenarios as the application grows or changes? Testomat

Maintaining Gherkin scenarios involves regularly updating scenarios, reviewing steps for relevancy, and organizing scenarios within a test management system to keep them aligned with the evolving application.

Are there any alternatives to Gherkin for BDD? Testomat

Yes, alternatives include tools like SpecFlow, Gauge, and FitNesse, which also support BDD but may have different syntaxes or features.

How does Gherkin integrate with Jira? Testomat

Gherkin can integrate with Jira through plugins or test management tools that sync Gherkin scenarios with Jira issues, making it easy to track and manage test cases directly within Jira.

📋 Test management system for Automated tests
Manage automation testing along with manual testing in one workspace. ⚙️
Follow us